Advocate of the Year
In the last fiscal year, Cynthia Catlin-Gaskins served a total of 15 children across 4 cases, each of which was a special request from the court. In one case, she was assigned to a four-child case where the children had been in two different placements and the case was accepted into one of the specialty courts. The specialty court was focused on the parents’ engagement in services and the positive feedback that was being reported. The court attempted to begin reunification through extended visits twice but was unsuccessful. Although the court continued to push for reunification, due to the parent's participation in services, Cynthia noted that the day-to-day behavior of the parent could place the children in danger. Cynthia was able to bring these concerns to the attention of the children's ad litem who agreed with the concerns. The children in this case had special needs and were confused by the repeated back and forth with their parents. Cynthia continued to remind all parties that the focus of the case should be the children's best interests. Throughout the case, there were numerous changes in caseworkers, which did not help the situation. At the time of trial, Cynthia was a key witness as she was the only individual with significant historical memory, due to so many caseworker changes. Ultimately, the court ordered the termination of all parental rights, and Cynthia continues to oversee the case as CPS now works to have all the children adopted.
While that case was ongoing, another special request was made for a nine-child case where the children were placed in four different placements. CASA staff determined that nine children across four placements was too much for one advocate alone, so two advocates were assigned to the case. Cynthia, in partnership with another advocate, has been able to work well together, look at the case in a objective and unbiased way, and be able to maintain good working relationships with all parties involved. They have done an amazing job working together and after the court terminated the parents' rights for lack of compliance, they have quickly worked to ensure the children are adopted by their placements. To date, eight of the nine children have been adopted.
Cynthia also took on two companion cases that had become very controversial due to one of the cases seemingly turning into a custody battle between a foster home and an identified relative out of state. The Court contacted CASA to insist that an objective advocate was needed due to competing perspectives of where the child should be placed and adopted. Cynthia had very little time before the child’s placement issue was to be heard in court. In about a month, she observed the child interact with relatives through a video call with the potential placement, where the child stayed for about 10 days, attended a post-termination parent/child visit with the parent, visited the child in the foster home, and visited the child at daycare. Through the child opening up to Cynthi, and their conversations with the parent, the child clearly expressed their wish to live permanently with their relative out of state. Unfortunately, the ad litem, without input from the child, was advocating for the child to stay in the foster home. When a motion was filed for the foster family to have post-placement visits with the child, Cynthia was called as a witness. Her testimony focused on how the adults on the case were focused on their positions and were ignoring what the child was trying to communicate. Cynthia was the voice of the child at that point and relayed everything the child said and even recommended that the child speak to the judge. When the judge asked the ad litem if they had interviewed the child, the ad litem acknowledged they had not spoken to the child. Based on Cynthia's testimony the judge determined it would not be necessary to speak to the child and ordered the immediate placement of the child with relatives.
Throughout many years of service, Cynthia Catlin-Gaskins has been a model of what a CASA advocate should be. Regardless of how complicated a case may be, the number of children involved, or the positions of other parties, She has been tireless in her efforts to advocate for the best interests of the children.